|
%
|
I
|
II 1
|
II 2
|
III
|
Pass
|
Fail
|
|
20
|
Evidence of Knowledge
Wide ranging, comprehensive, no gaps, outstanding grasp of material.
|
Well researched, fairly comprehensive, few gaps, very good grasp of material
|
Reasonably well researched, noticeable gaps, good grasp of material
|
Limits of knowledge, many gaps, lack of reading evidence
|
Superficial treatment, poor or incomplete level of knowledge
|
|
|
Scale 100
|
70
|
69
|
60
|
59
|
50
|
49
|
41
|
40
|
Fail
|
|
20
|
Progress and Progression
Outstanding accurate work, vocationally useful, almost no mistakes
|
At best a high level of argument achieved, cogent in knowledge and understanding but not in depth, well planned
|
Ability to construct an argument, generally clear, some planning obvious
|
Inadequate or weak argument, poorly planned, rambling
|
Very poor focus, little if any evidence of planning, confused incoherent.
|
|
|
Scale 100
|
70
|
69
|
60
|
59
|
50
|
49
|
41
|
40
|
Fail
|
|
30
|
Design Process
Authoritative, impressive level of argument willing to support both sides, all aspects covered
|
Very accurate work, vocationally promising, few mistakes
|
Reasonably accurate, of recognisable vocational applicability
|
Muddles or inaccurate for the most part, of dubious vocational applicability
|
Wholly inaccurate, wrong vocationally, dangerous or illegal
|
|
|
Scale 100
|
70
|
69
|
60
|
59
|
50
|
49
|
41
|
40
|
Fail
|
|
20
|
Concept Selection
Clear, conceptual framework, fully covering the correct issues with flair
|
Major issues discussed cogently in a clear format, efficiently executed
|
Satisfactory structure used, most of the main issues adequately developed into a coherent discussion
|
Weak structure with important gaps, unfocussed discussion with padding
|
Lack of structure, unfocussed, difficult to follow or unintelligible
|
|
|
Scale 100
|
70
|
69
|
60
|
59
|
50
|
49
|
41
|
40
|
Fail
|
|
5
|
Presentation & Expression
Exemplary, impressive, fluent, scholarly
|
Lucid, no weakness if expression, very good standard of presentation
|
Generally clear, any minor errors do not hinder communication or significantly detract from the piece
|
Variable quality, mostly with errors and poor style hindering communication
|
Consistently poor, many errors, rushed, difficult to understand
|
|
|
Scale 100
|
70
|
69
|
60
|
59
|
50
|
49
|
40
|
41
|
Fail
|
|
5
|
Use of External Factors
High content of original materials comprehensively handles
|
Wide use of original materials well handled
|
Mainly sound use of original materials
|
Over reliant on given sources, little or no attempt to look further afield
|
Incomplete or poor throughout, little evidence of involvement or engagement.
|
|
|
Scale 100
|
70
|
69
|
60
|
59
|
50
|
49
|
41
|
40
|
Fail
|
