Explain how the level of legal risk associated with some of these proposals may vary depending on the employment status of the people employed at Rose Hip Lodge.

0% Plagiarism Guaranteed & Custom Written

7OS01 Advanced Employment Law in Practice

Student Assessment Brief

Assessment ID / CIPD_7OS01_24_01

Advanced Diploma in

  • Strategic People Management
  • Strategic Learning and Development
  • Version 1 – Released September 2024
  • Expires June 2026
  • Study Centre information only: Last moderation window is September 2026

Introduction

Your knowledge and understanding of the material covered in this specialist unit will be assessed through your written answers to four questions.

You will write four answers of approximately 1000 words to the questions posed and submit them together in a single document. This constitutes your assessment for this unit. The total word count for the assessment will therefore be 4000 words, plus or minus 10%. The bibliography, list of references and essential appendices (if applicable) are not included in the total word count – but the latter must be kept to a minimum.

You must demonstrate within the submitted evidence (through headings and sub-headings) which learning outcomes and assessment criteria have been cited. We are unable to moderate your work if this is not included.

As this is an Advanced Diploma, it is important that you are able to demonstrate not only good knowledge and understanding of the material associated with each learning outcome, but also the ability to develop an original argument and justify it persuasively with reference to wider reading. Examples of approaches taken in a range of organisations are also an effective means by which to justify your arguments.

The six main criteria that CIPD requires centres to use when marking your assessment are outlined below, but it may be that not all these criteria are present in every question.

(1) focus

(2) depth and breadth of understanding

(3) strategic application and professional advice

(4) research and wider reading

(5) persuasiveness and originality

(6) presentation and language

Case study

Rose Hip Lodge is a nursing home located in a Welsh town. It houses 40 residents at any one time. Of these around half pay for their own care through private means, while the others have their fees met by the local authority. Rose Hip Lodge is one of six establishments owned by Mr Bradley Keepham. It is managed on a day-to-day basis by its matron, Mrs Jean Bunyon and her deputy, Ms Margery Shingles.

The permanent staff comprises five qualified nurses, five auxiliary nurses, two administrators and ten ancillary staff who undertake cleaning, catering and maintenance roles. Most of this latter group work on a casual basis with no regular weekly hours, coming in to work at Rose Hip Lodge when needed. Heavy additional use is made of agency-based nurse-bank staff so as to ensure that at least one qualified nurse and one auxiliary is present on the premises 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Profit margins are tight and have recently become tighter still as result of increases in fuel prices and the need to undertake substantial maintenance work to comply with new health and safety regulations. As there is only very limited scope for increasing fees, Bradley has forced Jean to cut her food budgets. The re-decoration programme has also been suspended, resulting in a home which appears increasingly shabby and depressing. In the last month, the financial situation has worsened. Five rooms have become vacant and have not been taken by new residents. As a result, the home is trading at a loss. There is no alternative but to look for ways of cutting back on the staffing budget. Bradley has asked Jean to put forward a plan which will result in savings of 5% immediately and 10% over the coming year. Her suggestions include the following:

i) Gerard was employed three months ago as a maintenance assistant. At his interview he was offered the job at a rate of £12.50 an hour, rising to £14.50 an hour provided he successfully completed a four-month probationary period. Jean believes, however, that because this was never put in writing it could be treated as an informal agreement. She thus proposes that Gerard`s pay is not increased next month, despite the fact that he has performed well in the role.

ii) Jean proposes to appoint new permanent members of staff on lower salaries than are currently paid to existing employees in each of the major staff groups and to include a stipulation that they work for longer hours each week. All jobs henceforth will be advertised at rates that are 20% below those paid to equivalent staff who are already employed and on contracts which simply specify that the hours worked each week will `vary according to the needs of the business`.

iii) Jean proposes to withdraw the Christmas bonus that has nearly always been paid in the past to all staff.

iv) Jean decides that she will need to make three people redundant - one qualified nurse, one auxiliary nurse and one member of the ancillary staff team. In order to keep the cost to an absolute minimum she decides that the best approach will simply be to dismiss the most recent starter in each case.

v)  Jean decides that if she is to reach her target of a 10% reduction in staff costs, there is no alternative but for herself and her long-serving deputy (Margery) to reduce their hours, and hence their take-home pay. Jean herself will not lose out because she will be compensated by an increase in the profit-related bonus she receives each year. Margery, though, will be left several pounds a week worse off by the change, despite having more free time.

vi) A junior care assistant called Tanya has recently been employed on £8.60 an hour (i.e. the rate of the National Minimum Wage for people aged 18-20). Jean is aware that she will have to be paid a higher rate of £11.44 an hour once she reaches the age of 21 next month. She therefore proposes to seek agreement with Tanya to continue paying her at the lower rate or to dismiss her and to replace her with an 18-year-old school leaver.

Jean discusses each of her proposals with Bradley. He congratulates her and asks her to implement all of them without delay.

Write a report of 4000 words (+/- 10%) which addresses each of the following questions. You should refer to leading cases as well as employment statutes when justifying your key points.

Question 1 (AC 1.3)

Explain how the level of legal risk associated with some of these proposals may vary depending on the employment status of the people employed at Rose Hip Lodge.

Question 2 (AC 2.1)

What potential legal risks can you identify in respect of discrimination law? What defences might the company be able to put forward were any of these matters to come before an employment tribunal?

Question 3 (AC 3.1)

What risks might Bradley and Jean encounter in respect of the law of contract if they were to implement these proposals? What advice would you give to them about these?

Question 4 (AC 4.2)

What potential legal risks can you identify in respect of the law on the payment of wages and salaries, and hours of work? What advice would you give Jean and Bradley on these issues.

Marking Grid

Learners will receive a Pass, Merit, Distinction or Refer/Fail result at unit level.

Assessors must provide a mark from 1 to 4 for each Learning Outcome in the unit. Assessors should use the generic grade descriptor grid as guidance so they can provide comprehensive feedback that is developmental for learners. Please be aware that not all of the generic grade descriptors will be present in every learning outcome for all the assessments, so assessors must use their discretion in making grading decisions.

To pass the unit assessment learners must achieve a 2 (Pass) or above for each of the learning outcomes.

The overall mark achieved will dictate the Grade the learner receives for the Unit, provided NONE of the learning outcomes have been failed or referred.

Overall mark

Unit result

0 to 7

Refer / Fail

8 or 9

Pass

10 to 13

Merit

14 to 16

Distinction

Learners’ result should be recorded in a marking grid similar to the example below.

Marking grid:

Learning outcome

Mark

 

LO1

2

LO2

3

LO3

3

LO4

2

Overall mark

10

 

Unit Result

Merit

Level 7 Advanced Diploma

Generic grade descriptors

 

REFER/FAIL / 1

 

PASS / 2

 

MERIT / 3

 

DISTINCTION / 4

Focus

Fails to address all the questions either sufficiently fully or directly.

An adequate attempt to address all the questions fully and directly.

A good attempt to address all the questions relatively well and directly.

An excellent attempt to address all the questions very well and directly.

Depth & breadth of understanding

Inadequate knowledge and understanding in respect of one or more of the questions. Limited depth and breadth of analysis.

Adequate knowledge and understanding across the questions. Satisfactory breadth and depth of analysis.

Full and solid knowledge and understanding across all the questions. Good breadth and depth of analysis.

Very full knowledge and understanding across all the questions. Excellent breadth and depth of analysis.

Strategic application & professional advice

Fails to provide appropriate or well-justified advice and/or recommendations. Lacks a strategic approach.

Provides adequately justified advice and informed recommendations Some strategic application.

Provides solid and thoughtful advice and well-informed recommendations. Clearly strategic in orientation.

Provides excellent advice and very well-informed recommendations. Strategically oriented in all respects.

Research & wider reading

Limited original research and/or appropriate wider reading for the assignment. Limited or no referencing.

Evidence of sufficient research and appropriate wider reading for the assignment. Satisfactory in- text referencing.

Evidence of significant research and thoughtful, appropriate wider reading for the assignment. A good standard of in-text referencing.

Evidence of considerable research and excellent, appropriate wider reading for the assignment. An excellent standard of in-text referencing

Persuasiveness & originality

Limited development of persuasive and original arguments. Inadequate use of examples.

An adequate attempt to develop original arguments and to justify these persuasively. Includes appropriate examples.

Some strong original arguments are presented which are mainly justified persuasively. Good use of examples.

Mostly strong original arguments are presented and justified very persuasively. Excellent use of examples.

Presentation & language

An inadequate standard of presentation or language. The assignment is poorly written and/or poorly structured. It is not at the level required for a management presentation.

A solid standard of presentation and use of language. The structure and ideas are satisfactory for a management presentation.

A strong and professional standard of presentation and use of language. The structure and ideas are well crafted for a management presentation.

An outstanding standard of presentation and use of language. The structure and ideas are very well crafted for a management presentation.

Sample Answer - Order Now to Get 100% Plagiarism free Answers with 100% Guaranteed Pass

Question 1 (AC 1.3)

Explain how the level of legal risk associated with some of these proposals may vary depending on the employment status of the people employed at Rose Hip Lodge.

Rose Hip Lodge, a nursing home located in a Welsh town, is grappling with financial difficulties, which have led to various proposals aimed at cutting staffing costs. Each of these proposals carries different legal risks, depending on the employment status of the employees involved. The level of legal risk associated with these proposals can vary for employees, workers, and self-employed contractors, and this will be explored with reference to key cases and relevant employment statutes.

In this section, we will discuss the legal implications of the proposals in relation to the employment status of the workers at Rose Hip Lodge. We will also look at how these risks can differ depending on whether individuals are classified as employees, workers, or independent contractors.

Understanding Employment Status

Before addressing the legal risks associated with each proposal, it is important to understand the different types of employment status:

  1. Employees: Employees work under a contract of employment and are entitled to a wide range of employment rights, including protection from unfair dismissal, redundancy pay, statutory sick pay, and protection against unlawful deductions from wages.

  2. Workers: Workers have more limited rights than employees but are still entitled to certain protections such as the National Minimum Wage (NMW), protection from discrimination, and the right to paid annual leave.

  3. Self-employed Contractors: Self-employed contractors are not classified as employees or workers. They typically have fewer rights, as they are responsible for their own taxes and working conditions. However, they are still entitled to some rights, such as protection against discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.

The key legal risks discussed in this report will depend on whether the individual is classified as an employee, worker, or self-employed contractor.

Proposal 1: Gerard’s Pay Increase

Proposal: Jean proposes to withhold Gerard’s pay increase, despite it being agreed verbally during his interview, because it was not documented in writing.

Legal Risk: The level of legal risk in this case is high if Gerard is classified as an employee. In such cases, there is an implied term in every employment contract that the employer will act in good faith and maintain mutual trust and confidence. According to Carter v. James (2007), a verbal agreement can be legally binding if there is evidence of a mutual agreement and a clear intention to form a contract.

If Gerard is classified as a worker, his legal rights are more limited. However, he could still have a claim based on the breach of implied terms, such as the implied duty of trust and confidence. Spruce v. Middlesex Hospital NHS Trust (1997) confirmed that even for workers, employers must comply with minimum terms such as agreed pay.

Risk Mitigation: If Gerard is an employee, withholding the pay increase could lead to a claim of breach of contract or constructive dismissal. The risk could be reduced by ensuring clear, written agreements regarding pay increases and job terms from the outset.

Continued...


100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
Tailored to your instructions
paypal checkout

Our Giveaways

Plagiarism Report

for £20 Free

Formatting

for £12 Free

Title page

for £10 Free

Bibliography

for £18 Free

Outline

for £9 Free

Limitless Amendments

for £14 Free

Get all these features for
£83.00 FREE

ORDER NOW
Still Not Convinced?

View our samples written by our professional writers to let you comprehend how your work is going to look like. We have categorised this into 3 categories with a few different subject domains

View Our Samples

Recent Uploads

FLAT 50% OFF ON EVERY ORDER.Use "FLAT50" as your promo code during checkout