GRADE
|
Criterion 1: Marketing communication plan
|
Criterion 2: Organisation/brand’s marketing communication strategy and content
|
Criterion 3: Marketing communication plan knowledge and understanding
|
Criterion 4: Evidence of independent study and relevant academic sources
|
Criterion 5: Communication
|
A
|
Demonstrates exceptional completion of the following aspects of the marketing communication plan assessment criteria:
- The environment is accurately clarified and described and delivers all the relevant information necessary for a full understanding.
- Exceptional understanding of marketing communication strategy (STP) concepts.
|
Demonstrates exceptional appraisal of the following:
- Marketing communication messages
- Media channels and platforms
- Proposed creative marketing communications executions.
|
Exceptional breadth and depth of knowledge (i.e. key terminology is used throughout and in the right context) together with very strong clear independent critically evaluative understanding.
|
Goes well beyond what is taught in reading/researching to inform learning.
|
Excellent communication/ presentation skills demonstrating clarity, and coherence that is well judged.
The presentation of your report is excellent in terms of structure and logical progression, grammar, spelling, and Harvard referencing.
|
B
|
Demonstrates very good completion of the following aspects of the marketing communication plan assessment criteria:
- The environment is described and clarified, and omissions do not seriously impede understanding.
- Thorough understanding of marketing communication strategy (STP) concepts.
|
Demonstrates very good appraisal of the following:
- Marketing communication messages
- Media channels and platforms
- Proposed creative marketing communications executions.
|
Knowledge demonstrates thorough depth and breadth of learning (i.e. key terminology is mostly used) together with independent critically evaluative understanding.
|
Evidence of insight in selection and use of material to go beyond what is taught.
|
Very good communication/ presentation skills, appropriate to audience to convey meaning, demonstrating strong competence, accuracy, clarity and judgement.
|
C
|
Demonstrates good completion of the following aspects of the marketing communication plan assessment criteria:
- Organisational context is stated but some aspects are undefined, boundaries undetermined, and/or backgrounds unknown.
- Good understanding of marketing communication strategy (STP) concepts.
|
Demonstrates good appraisal of the following:
- Marketing communication messages
- Media channels and platforms
- Proposed creative marketing communications executions.
|
Knowledge demonstrates good depth and breadth of learning (i.e. key terminology is used in places) together with emerging independent critically evaluative understanding.
|
Good breadth of understanding of taught content and set reading/references.
|
Communication/ presentation of information/ evidence to convey understanding and meaning demonstrates competence, accuracy and clarity.
|
D
|
Assignment submitted demonstrates adequate completion of the following aspects of the marketing communication plan assessment criteria:
- Organisational context is stated, but without clarification and/or description.
- Sufficient understanding of marketing communication strategy (STP).
|
Demonstrates adequate appraisal of the following:
- Marketing communication messages
- Media channels and platforms
- Proposed creative marketing communications executions.
|
Knowledge sufficient to demonstrate sound learning (but with limited use of key terminology) with some standard critically evaluative understanding.
|
Relies on adequate selection of set materials/standard readings and references.
|
Competent accurate communication/ presentation of information/ evidence to convey understanding, possibly with some minor weaknesses.
|
E-F
|
Some engagement and understanding, but overall does not quite meet criteria for the task.
|
Some engagement and understanding, but overall does not quite meet criteria for the task.
|
Weak or insufficient knowledge and understanding to demonstrate effective learning
|
Limited evidence of use of set materials/relevant academic sources and references.
|
Arguments/ explanations are weak and poorly constructed, and/or unsubstantiated.
|
G
|
Very limited engagement and understanding, and overall poor response to task.
|
Very limited engagement and understanding, and overall poor response to task.
|
Very limited knowledge and understanding indicating ineffective learning.
|
Very little evidence of set materials/relevant academic sources and references.
|
Arguments/explanations are lacking in logic and/or unsubstantiated.
|
H / NS
|
Seriously inadequate or insufficient response to task-non-submission
|
Seriously inadequate or insufficient response to task-non-submission
|
Seriously inadequate knowledge and understanding indicating ineffective learning/non-submission.
|
Seriously inadequate or insufficient response to task/non-submission.
|
Arguments/explanations are lacking in logic and/or unsubstantiated.
|