🔥 Custom, Original & AI-Free Assignments — Get it Today!
BMP5004 Project Management
Module Number: BMP5004
Module Name: Project Management
Year/Trimester/Cohort: 2022-23/Semester 1/September 2022 Cohort
Module Tutor/s:
|
Assessment Number |
1 |
|
Assessment Type (and weighting) |
Poster and Defence - 50% (Submission with voice over) |
|
Assessment Name |
Project planning approaches and techniques |
|
Assessment Submission Date |
Sunday 06 November 2022 at 23:59 |
Learning Outcomes Assessed:
LO1: Compare and contrast project planning approaches and techniques
Assessment Brief:
Design a Poster highlighting the approaches and techniques used in Project Management.
Your presentation should also include:
- An analysis of the theoretical approaches utilised within Project Management.
- An analysis of the control techniques utilised to deliver a successful Project.
|
Secondary Research Source Requirement at Level HE5 - It is expected that the Reference List will contain between ten and fifteen sources. As a MINIMUM the Reference List should include two refereed academic journals and three academic books. |
Assessment Preparation and Submission:
See section 12 of the module guide for Guidelines on the Preparation and Submission of Assignments.
Additional Submission Instructions:
You are required to submit a soft copy via “Turn-it-in UK” on the module Moodle page. The software will allow you to check your work against other material on the internet. It will also compare your work against other students work.
You will be able to upload drafts of your written work into turn-it-in as many times as you wish before the deadline.
You will not be able to overwrite the final submission after the deadline. You can only submit a single file. LO1: Compare and contrast project planning approaches and techniques
Advice:
- Do not cut and paste phrases or paragraphs from published sources. You should seek to use your own words to explain concepts and theory.
- If you wish to refer to specific quotes from published sources, then you must use full Harvard Referencing Convention.
- Do not share work with other students.
Specific Assessment Criteria: (See page 4 for General Assessment Criteria)
Excellent (70%+): The poster will be to a very high standard. It will provide a comprehensive explanation of project management and an overview of the project planning approaches and techniques. Further, the work will exhibit a thorough appreciation of academic sources and the application of criteria to determine a suitable citation.
Very Good (60-69%): The poster will be to a very good standard. It will provide a very clear explanation of project management and an overview of the project planning approaches and techniques. Further, the work will exhibit a very good appreciation of academic sources and the application of criteria to determine a suitable citation.
Good (50-59%): The poster will be to a good standard. It will provide a good explanation of project management and an overview of the project planning approaches and techniques. Further, the work will exhibit a good appreciation of academic sources and the application of criteria to determine a suitable citation. LO1: Compare and contrast project planning approaches and techniques
Satisfactory (40-49%): The poster will be to a satisfactory standard. It will provide a explanation of project management and an overview of the project planning approaches and techniques. Further, the work will exhibit a reasonable appreciation of academic sources and the application of criteria to determine a suitable citation.
Unsatisfactory (Below 40%): Students who do not meet the requirements of a pass grade (40% or above) will not successfully complete the assessment activity.
Tailored to your instructions
